Difference between revisions of "Team Fortress Wiki:Featured articles"

From Team Fortress Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Meet The Team: new section)
(Meet The Team)
Line 220: Line 220:
 
Informative and well written. --[[User:Picard|Picard]] <sup>[[User talk:Picard|talk]]</sup> 21:40, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
 
Informative and well written. --[[User:Picard|Picard]] <sup>[[User talk:Picard|talk]]</sup> 21:40, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
  
== [[Meet The Team]] ==
+
== [[Meet the Team]] ==
  
 
I would like to nominate the Meet the Team page.  Why?  Because it can kick your ass; I know it kicked mine.  That's just how good it is.  So why waste time listening to a mortal such as myself explain it?  Check it out yourself. [[User:TheTimesAndQueriesOfMyAss|TheTimesAndQueriesOfMyAss]] 14:28, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
 
I would like to nominate the Meet the Team page.  Why?  Because it can kick your ass; I know it kicked mine.  That's just how good it is.  So why waste time listening to a mortal such as myself explain it?  Check it out yourself. [[User:TheTimesAndQueriesOfMyAss|TheTimesAndQueriesOfMyAss]] 14:28, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:29, 16 June 2011

Featured articles

Featured articles exemplify some of the best written and most informational articles on Team Fortress Wiki. Featured articles must adhere to the featured article criteria below.

Criteria

  1. A featured article is—
    • informative: it should contain both helpful and useful information;
    • comprehensive: it should be complete, without omission of major facts or details; and
    • accurate: it should be factually accurate, and sourced where appropriate.
  2. It should also be—
    • well-written: the prose of the article is engaging, and of a professional standard;
    • properly styled: the article should follow all conventions in the style guide;
    • stable: the article should not be currently undergoing any major revisions or edit wars; and
    • of appropriate length: the article should stay focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail.
  3. Its use of media should be—
    • referential: images should be used as a source of reference;
    • to clarify: images should be used to help illustrate a point; and
    • informational: images should be used to display additional information.
    • Media used on a featured article must be appropriately licensed and include source information on the file description page.
  4. A featured article must also be—
    • well-connected: by—
      • linking to all relevant articles; and
      • linking to reliable outside sources where appropriate.

Current featured articles

Achieved.png

Nomination procedure

To nominate an article—

  1. Ensure that the article meets the criteria;
  2. Add a new section to the Current nominations section below, and include a link to the article and a statement from you about it; then
  3. Add {{Featured article candidate}} to the talk page of the article.

Anyone is free to nominate any article they consider to meet the featured criteria.

Current nominations

Walkway

I'd like to bring tr_walkway to the light. I think it would be a nice article to feature on the front page to users who are curious about TF2. It could use some more information, but it's a consideration. TechnetiumG 23:20, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram minus.png Oppose: The article itself doesn't really offer any interesting information that deserves to be highlighted. This is probably because there really isn't a whole lot to Walkway, other than it being a community-made training map. I think that the official blog highlight was enough. --Ten19 05:44, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Headless Horseless Horseman

I nominate the HHH as it is informitive, interesting, and goes by the required set of rules for a featured article. --The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sandvich Heavinski (talk) • (contribs) 23:32, 14 January 2011

Probably not the best idea since it is quite cluttered and in need of a cleanup.--Focusknock 23:42, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

Wrangler

I nominate the Wrangler page, because it's awesome.

Hilarious Pill 11:40, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram plus.png Support - Informative, well detailed, and in a correct layout. Everything you need to know, really.--Focusknock 19:36, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Pictogram plus.png Support Simply a great article. I approve.  –  Duel RED.png Epic Eric Duel BLU.png (T | C) 19:12, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
Pictogram plus.png Support FEATURE THIS BAD BOY! --Stevoisiak 18:09, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
Pictogram plus.png Support Well-formatted, I like it --User Firestorm Flame.png Firestorm 19:19, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

2fort

Informative, well-written and such a good map.  – User Ohyeahcrucz Sig.png Ohyeahcrucz [T][C] 23:35, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram plus.png Support I don't see why not. The 2Fort article is nicely written, and as probably the most iconic map in the game I think it deserves a spot on the main page. Xenak (Talk|Contribs) 00:02, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
I'm conflicted. On one side, it's 2fort, but on the other, it's a well written article. It's hard to measure out the good from the bad in this. Leaderboard class soldier.pngJust a Gigolo - (talk) 00:04, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
Pictogram comment.png Comment It's not a matter of being iconic or a good map; it's a matter of being a greatly-written article. For instance, we have Dynamite Pack, a rather "hidden" article, and it became featured.  –  Duel RED.png Epic Eric Duel BLU.png (T | C) 00:08, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram plus.png Support Well formatted, looks good --User Firestorm Flame.png Firestorm 19:19, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Critical hits

This article is informative, includes images and charts, examples, links, adequate trivia, correct information, among other qualities. It certainly deserves to be featured.  –  Duel RED.png Epic Eric Duel BLU.png (T | C) 00:23, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

I agree. The information on how crits work is enough to get it in alone. Leaderboard class soldier.pngJust a Gigolo - (talk) 00:26, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
Pictogram plus.png Support. It's a cool article and meets the criteria.  – User Ohyeahcrucz Sig.png Ohyeahcrucz [T][C] 00:27, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
Pictogram comment.png YES! Yeah Criticals hit page looks great,Put it in. THE3STOOGES 00:34, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
Pictogram plus.png Support Yep, lookin' good! --User Firestorm Flame.png Firestorm 19:19, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
Pictogram plus.png Support That Special Cases section looks like a box packed with all kinds of information until you stop and read it. I think this is pretty much the only issue, and it's not actually a problem. IMO the whole article is brilliant. And there are graphics - you can always trust those graphics! =] Deveen [T][C] 19:06, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

Valve's Team Fortress

Just nominating. SiPlus 16:13, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram minus.png Disagree Not really relevant --User Firestorm Flame.png Firestorm 15:46, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Companies

It's a bit short, and offers little more than a gallery of pretty pictures at the moment, but it's really one of my favorite articles. Links off to several weapons, maps, and classes. There's also a link to the posters article, which has those calenders on it. You know the ones. SilverHammer 20:02, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram minus.png Disagree While nice, it really doesn't have much relevance. -User Firestorm Flame.png Firestorm 15:46, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Bonk! Atomic Punch

The Bonk! Atomic Punch page is pretty full. I did a bit of sprucing up on it this morning, and it doesn't look half bad, I think. Not to say it looked bad before, it was just a good before! But now it's like, super good. It's got trivia for the nerds and bugs for people to mack fun of, too! And get a load of that thick, juicy update history. Don't even get me started on crafting! This article is pretty much, in my opinion, the weapon article. SilverHammer 23:05, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

Medic

On top of being a well filled-out article, it's also currently relevant. Community's a-buzz with talk of a Medic update. Whether it comes or not, people will still be interested. It's odd how many people you come across who don't know that Medic's from Stuttgart. SilverHammer 07:24, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram plus.png Support Will probably feature this if/when Meet the Medic comes out, if that sounds good to everyone else! --User Firestorm Flame.png Firestorm 15:46, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Item quality

It's informative and well written, and it's also relevant. I don't see why not.  – User Ohyeahcrucz Sig.png Ohyeahcrucz [T][C] 21:50, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Taunts

Informative and well written. --Picard talk 21:40, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Meet the Team

I would like to nominate the Meet the Team page. Why? Because it can kick your ass; I know it kicked mine. That's just how good it is. So why waste time listening to a mortal such as myself explain it? Check it out yourself. TheTimesAndQueriesOfMyAss 14:28, 16 June 2011 (UTC)