File talk:Scrapped emily portrait 01.jpg
The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Uncensoring?
Left uncensored, it's hardly pornographic, but I thought I'd see what others think before marking it for improvement.
Support danimart 17:15, 3 January 2011 (UTC)- Support-Shine 08:29, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support– Smashman (talk) 14:25, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support We don't censor content unless it is in violation of the Terms_of_Use. -- Pilk (talk) 14:30, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support-- Benjamuffin
(talk | contribs) 14:34, 22 December 2010 (UTC) - Support If a man's got to fap... -RJs
- Support It's not really pornographic. During this time period, portraits like this were just a statement on natural beauty or how the body is beautiful. This is also an M rated game, kids shouldn't know what this game is to find this. -= M-NINJA
=- 20:53, 22 December 2010 (UTC) - Support Adult-oriented game, adult-oriented content --Vaught 03:57, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Parseus ( | talk) 07:47, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support Don't see it causing any real harm. -- Garticuno 00:24, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support We don't censor anything on this Wiki. -- En Ex (talk) 23:40, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support It's not even remotely pornographic. In comparison, Botticelli's Birth of Venus is M-Rated.--Kid Of The Century 08:41, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support While Emily is one ugly little monster, I agree with the rest. -- OluapPlayer (t)
19:24, 29 December 2010 (UTC) - Support Natemckn 00:33, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support It really isjust like Birth of Venus --EvilDeadFan
03:07, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
As it turns out, after checking with one of Mann Manor's creators, there never was an uncensored version. So, closing the debate... -- En Ex (talk) 03:37, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
The preceding discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
