Difference between revisions of "File talk:Scrapped emily portrait 01.jpg"
m |
(→Uncensoring?) |
||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
:Is her lack of nipples canon? It may explain her angry disposition :D '''<span style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:83%;">—[[File:User Moussekateer signature sprite.png|31px|link=User:Moussekateer]][[User:Moussekateer|<span style="color:black">Moussekateer</span>]]·[[User talk:Moussekateer|<span style="color:black;font-size:82%;">talk</span>]]</span>''' 03:53, 4 January 2011 (UTC) | :Is her lack of nipples canon? It may explain her angry disposition :D '''<span style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:83%;">—[[File:User Moussekateer signature sprite.png|31px|link=User:Moussekateer]][[User:Moussekateer|<span style="color:black">Moussekateer</span>]]·[[User talk:Moussekateer|<span style="color:black;font-size:82%;">talk</span>]]</span>''' 03:53, 4 January 2011 (UTC) | ||
::Rexy, thanks for the information on the drawing. -- [[User:En_Ex|En Ex]] <sub>([[User_talk:En_Ex|talk]])</sub> 03:54, 4 January 2011 (UTC) | ::Rexy, thanks for the information on the drawing. -- [[User:En_Ex|En Ex]] <sub>([[User_talk:En_Ex|talk]])</sub> 03:54, 4 January 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | Sure. I imagine I would be angry if I were lacking nipples. -- [[User:Rexy|Rexy]] 03:55, January 2011 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 03:55, 4 January 2011
The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Uncensoring?
Left uncensored, it's hardly pornographic, but I thought I'd see what others think before marking it for improvement.
Support danimart 17:15, 3 January 2011 (UTC)- Support-Shine 08:29, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support– Smashman (talk) 14:25, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support We don't censor content unless it is in violation of the Terms_of_Use. -- Pilk (talk) 14:30, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support-- Benjamuffin
(talk | contribs) 14:34, 22 December 2010 (UTC) - Support If a man's got to fap... -RJs
- Support It's not really pornographic. During this time period, portraits like this were just a statement on natural beauty or how the body is beautiful. This is also an M rated game, kids shouldn't know what this game is to find this. -= M-NINJA
=- 20:53, 22 December 2010 (UTC) - Support Adult-oriented game, adult-oriented content --Vaught 03:57, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Parseus ( | talk) 07:47, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support Don't see it causing any real harm. -- Garticuno 00:24, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support We don't censor anything on this Wiki. -- En Ex (talk) 23:40, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support It's not even remotely pornographic. In comparison, Botticelli's Birth of Venus is M-Rated.--Kid Of The Century 08:41, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support While Emily is one ugly little monster, I agree with the rest. -- OluapPlayer (t)
19:24, 29 December 2010 (UTC) - Support Natemckn 00:33, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support It really isjust like Birth of Venus --EvilDeadFan
03:07, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
As it turns out, after checking with one of Mann Manor's creators, there never was an uncensored version. So, closing the debate... -- En Ex (talk) 03:37, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
The preceding discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
- There is an uncensored version. I merely quick censored and uploaded it just so I wouldn't be bothered to upload a censored version later. I am not a proponent of censorship, and do not support it in any way. I have replaced with the uncensored version. If you must enjoy her in the nude, please, you may now do so, it's not like I drew in big nipples or anything. I plan on finishing this portrait and using it in an upcoming project, so there might be some fun ahead. -- Rexy 03:48, January 2011 (UTC)
- Is her lack of nipples canon? It may explain her angry disposition :D —
Moussekateer·talk 03:53, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
Sure. I imagine I would be angry if I were lacking nipples. -- Rexy 03:55, January 2011 (UTC)
