Difference between revisions of "Talk:Pomson 6000"

From Team Fortress Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(TFC Railgun: new section)
(TFC Railgun)
Line 17: Line 17:
 
== TFC Railgun ==
 
== TFC Railgun ==
  
When I first heard about this weapon It reminded me greatly of the TFC Railgun for the engineer, although the only aspects it retains are:
+
When I first heard about this weapon It reminded me greatly of the TFC [[Railgun_(Classic)]] for the engineer, although the only aspects it retains are:
*Penetrates multiple targets
 
 
*Is a non explosive projectile weapon
 
*Is a non explosive projectile weapon
 
*Doesn't use conventional ammo
 
*Doesn't use conventional ammo
 
So the relation is slim at best.[[User:Nintyuk|Nintyuk]] 09:52, 17 December 2011 (PST)
 
So the relation is slim at best.[[User:Nintyuk|Nintyuk]] 09:52, 17 December 2011 (PST)

Revision as of 18:03, 17 December 2011

This thing has the potential to completely change the metagame. I sincerely hope it doesn't work on people that are already ubered. Grug 23:55, 14 December 2011 (PST)

The wiki is not a place to discuss this kind of stuff. Take it to the Steam Forums.  –  Cructo [T][C] 23:57, 14 December 2011 (PST)
Hey, this sort of discussion about the game (rather than the wiki) would probably better suited for a forum like the official Steam User Forums. – fashnek (talk·c) 23:57, 14 December 2011 (PST)

Is it just me

I just realized that Pomson sounds similar to Template:W, which by the way, is very famous for submachine gun and stuff. We don't know well about this item yet, but could there be any correlation? --Herr Queso 12:07, 15 December 2011 (PST)

"Blasting out rapid-succession pulses of cross-spectrum electromagnetic radiation, the Pomson has been shown to dissolve an Egyptian pyramid in four archeologically educational weeks or one of the smaller, slightly crappier Mayan ones in just under a fortnight." the item's design/function seems to be based on automatic weaponry. so yes. HyenaDip 12:19, 15 December 2011 (PST)
I don't think it would be appropriate to note in the article unless you get confirmation from Greg Broadmore or the other folks at Weta Workshop. – fashnek (talk·c) 12:23, 15 December 2011 (PST)
Thanks HyenaDip for confirming it :) and uh no I wasn't really asking about "should I add this to trivia". I was just asking for possibility of coorelation. and yes I clearly know it's really early for adding this. --Herr Queso 12:31, 15 December 2011 (PST)

I made this thing a few months back

The exact same model. The exact same weapon. I never finished it. Only thing it needed was a texture, and now it's officially in TF2. Whether Valve-made or contributed, I dunno, but it's there. Man oh man am I pissed. The preceding unsigned comment was added by Recurracy (talk) • (contribs) 08:13, 16 December 2011

If it's any consolation, someone from Weta Workshop modeled it - I don't imagine they would even have been allowed to use a community-contributed one. Anyway, discussions like this are best kept on the forums. » Cooper Kid (blether) • (contreebs) 04:01, 16 December 2011 (PST)

TFC Railgun

When I first heard about this weapon It reminded me greatly of the TFC Railgun_(Classic) for the engineer, although the only aspects it retains are:

  • Is a non explosive projectile weapon
  • Doesn't use conventional ammo

So the relation is slim at best.Nintyuk 09:52, 17 December 2011 (PST)