Difference between revisions of "Talk:Sapper"
(→"Destroy 3 0" exploit: new section) |
Funkadacious (talk | contribs) (→Trivia: new section) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
I would argue the "Destroy 3 0" trick belongs in Bugs, since it's prone to abuse - I managed to milk a single unattended Level 1 Sentry for over 20 points before it got destroyed by the Sapper damage. And that was with a simple bind; with scripting the situation is likely a lot worse. [[User:NVis|NVis]] 22:14, 14 November 2010 (UTC) | I would argue the "Destroy 3 0" trick belongs in Bugs, since it's prone to abuse - I managed to milk a single unattended Level 1 Sentry for over 20 points before it got destroyed by the Sapper damage. And that was with a simple bind; with scripting the situation is likely a lot worse. [[User:NVis|NVis]] 22:14, 14 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Trivia == | ||
| + | |||
| + | "Although it was sped up severely, the Spy would slowly flick a switch on the Electro Sapper's interface." | ||
| + | Is the term 'severely' used properly here? The definition of the word is "difficult to endure" or "grave". I don't think that that word would be properly used in this setting. | ||
| + | How about "Although greatly sped up,..." or something similar? [[User:Funkadacious|Funkadacious]] 22:51, 15 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 22:51, 15 November 2010
Contents
Can Engineers get sapper kill assists from Pyros?
I don't think so, since it only takes one hit to destroy a sapper. Delicious cake 21:34, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
- What about in the instance where the Engineer hits the sapper once, damaging it but not destroying it, and then a Pyro destroys it? That would be a kill assist for the Engineer.--Focusknock s 20:13, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
Sapper skin
That skin is awesome. If I had an iphone/ipod touch, I would totally get that. --Firestorm 16:57, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
- Me too. All the new merchandise is cool. -- Nineaxis
17:00, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
- It's too bad that international shipping is twenty freakin' dollars --Firestorm 17:01, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
"Destroy 3 0" exploit
I would argue the "Destroy 3 0" trick belongs in Bugs, since it's prone to abuse - I managed to milk a single unattended Level 1 Sentry for over 20 points before it got destroyed by the Sapper damage. And that was with a simple bind; with scripting the situation is likely a lot worse. NVis 22:14, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
Trivia
"Although it was sped up severely, the Spy would slowly flick a switch on the Electro Sapper's interface." Is the term 'severely' used properly here? The definition of the word is "difficult to endure" or "grave". I don't think that that word would be properly used in this setting. How about "Although greatly sped up,..." or something similar? Funkadacious 22:51, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
