Difference between revisions of "User talk:I-ghost/Help:GCF"

From Team Fortress Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m
(Archive this page?: new section)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 7: Line 7:
 
== Open Review ==
 
== Open Review ==
  
Can this flag get removed to clear out the associated task list entry? {{User:Darkid/Sig}} 14:02, 2 June 2012 (PDT)
+
Can this flag get removed to clear out the associated task list entry? [[User:Darkid|<span style="color:#7E7355">Darkid</span>]] ([[User talk:Darkid|<span style="color:#3F56AD">Talk</span>]] | [[Special:Contributions/Darkid|<span style="color:#CC2200">contribs</span>]]) 14:02, 2 June 2012 (PDT)
 
::::I agree. [[User:NameUser|NameUser]] 22:14, 25 June 2012 (PDT)
 
::::I agree. [[User:NameUser|NameUser]] 22:14, 25 June 2012 (PDT)
 +
 +
== Archive this page? ==
 +
 +
Since TF2 hasn't used the GCF file structure since the Steam Pipe update in 2013, should we archive this page on some way? Maybe use the 'Historical' template? No matter what we do, we should at least remove the "Open Review" marker. [[User:Jboby1|Jboby1]] ([[User talk:Jboby1|talk]]) 07:34, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 07:34, 22 July 2018

Clarity

The contents are all good, but it seems like some parts could be more clear to people who aren't familiar, since I assume that's the goal of the article. VOs could be "voiceovers" and the paths would be easier to read if the GCF filenames were shortened to prefixes like materials/... and content/... Are closed captioning filenames really closecaption_lan.txtg or is that a typo? --Fashnek 17:28, 13 November 2011 (PST)

Yeah, I think that's a typo. If it's not, I don't know WHAT it is. -NameUser 22:15, 25 June 2012 (PDT)

Open Review

Can this flag get removed to clear out the associated task list entry? Darkid (Talk | contribs) 14:02, 2 June 2012 (PDT)

I agree. NameUser 22:14, 25 June 2012 (PDT)

Archive this page?

Since TF2 hasn't used the GCF file structure since the Steam Pipe update in 2013, should we archive this page on some way? Maybe use the 'Historical' template? No matter what we do, we should at least remove the "Open Review" marker. Jboby1 (talk) 07:34, 22 July 2018 (UTC)