Team Fortress Wiki:Archived discussions/Talk:Team Fortress 2 Argentina

The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it.

Deletion

•  Support-Shine[] 20:59, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support True, so true. Shock394 23:42, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Comment Not sure on this one. We do have community sites listed. Sure, this one isn't the best quality, but... well, it could be worked on? I don't know. ~ lhavelund ^{(talk ▪ contrib)} 00:12, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose If we have pages for other community sites, I don't see why they shouldn't get one, assuming they improve it. Vekter 03:58, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

• Unless the community site have low amount of detail in it. Shock394 17:20, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

•  Support This, and other pages with only this much info on a site, should be moved into a list. Not with one line per site, but, you know, like Non-player characters is, with a section for every site. --MasterOfTheXP 04:42, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support I think we should not keep articles about non-English websites on wiki. Or, move them to proper wiki language. SiPlus 08:35, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- OluapPlayer _(t) 01:23, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support I like XP's idea. Just put them in a nice list so anyone can look. --Vaught 02:23, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Parseus ( | talk) 06:13, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support (nanosheep_inc) 06:16, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose See Vekter's response above. Stab ! 23:40, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose What Vekter said. CANPoo 23:42, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support I want to third XP's idea. FlotsamX 04:57, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support There's probably more TF2 community pages than any of us can think of, but I don't think every one is notable. ButteredToast 17:27, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support No need to have a wiki page for a community website. Keep them on a separate list, maybe add a link to the Argentinian version of the homepage or something. - Mistah Phoenix 02:08, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support My rule of thumb about these mattters is "If it wasn't at least mentioned on the official Blog, it shouldn't be on the official wiki". But to be fair towards anyone, I think MasterOfTheXP's idea is the best.--Kid Of The Century 10:25, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Gotta agree with MasterOfTheXP. 404 User Not Found 14:21, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose We already have pages about other community websites, I personally have never heard of this one but it must be important for the South American community, therefore I don't think it should be deleted. Allukard 00:11, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose I agree with Allukard, as this may be important for the South American community Checkers123 18:56, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose what's the harm in keeping it here? rather than deleting it, there's several other pages that are for similar community websites HyenaDip 19:37, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support ...just because Team Fortress 2 wiki it's not a community websites wiki. Mozgoed 21:17, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

 Support For the same reasons those above have supported with. -- Benjamuffin 15:12, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

•  Support Because a) It's not in English, and b) Unlike other community site pages (e.g. TF2 Backpack Examiner), it provides no useful information about the site. Netshroud 02:13, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Keep it. Its a valid site and it needs to be expanded a bit from the community. You guys can't say "Its small and has no information" because its you who is supposed to be putting it there, if you use that reason we should delete you. And what Netshroud said about "It's not in English" Is totally INVALID because this is a multilingual wiki as in there are different languages for the wiki not just "English".

- Meter1060 02:45, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

•  Support There is hardly any content here. Unless the site's members or someone who speaks the language used on the site is willing to improve upon the article, it should be waving goodbye. --Fragment of Nothing 16:02, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

 Oppose I say it should stay for a while bit longer, I mean just because it in a different language doesn't mean you should delete it. Although, if it doesn't get and for info in like a say two weeks then I say delete it.

Sign your name with 4 tildes and the discussion is going on for more than 2 weeks. Shock394 19:38, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

 Info I've checked the website, and its blog THE WHOLE WEBSITE hasn't been updated for about 5 months. Shock394 00:59, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

•  Support I think in light of the fact that the site hasn't been updated in 6 months and the forums are dead (Look at all this unmoderated spam), this should clearly be deleted. —Moussekateer·talk 18:27, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

 Comment More reasons to show it should be deleted, I think it should be deleted immediately. Shock394 23:07, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

The preceding discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it.